Tactical particularities of interrogation in the investigation of money laundering offenses

Authors

Keywords:

interrogation tactics, forensics, money laundering, testimonial evidence, criminalinvestigation, confrontation, evidentiary statements

Abstract

This article explores the complexity of interrogation tactics in the investigation of the crime of money laundering, highlighting the central role of this procedural action in reconstructing sophisticated and concealed criminal mechanisms. The study analyzes the frequency and effectiveness of interrogations in criminal cases, addressing separately the interrogation of suspects/accused persons, witnesses, experts, and other participants depending on their procedural status, level of involvement, and type of information held The paper emphasizes the importance of adapting the interrogation tactic according to the nature of the subjects' social and professional relationships, their degree of cooperation, and the documentary nature of the evidentiary material. It discusses methods for fostering cooperation, managing the influence of the defense counsel, the particularities of confrontation in adversarial contexts, and the use of psychological strategies to elicit the truth. The conclusion underscores that, in the context of economic and financial crimes, interrogation is not merely a formal instrument, but a key investigative method capable of clarifying the offender’s intent, the flow of illicit funds, and the connections among participants.

References

Cazan, Elena; Matei, Daniela; Gavriș, Radu. The Tactics of Interviewing in Criminal Proceedings: A Guide to Good Practices. Târgu Jiu: Măiastra Publishing House, 2020.

Dragulean, Alexandru; Nestor, Sergiu. Psychological Coordinates of Criminal Investigation in the Suspect’s Hearing Process. In: Scientific Annals of the “Ștefan cel Mare” Academy of the MIA of the Republic of Moldova: Legal Sciences, 2015, No. XV(2), pp. 68–73.

Duvac, Constantin. Forensics. Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2024.

Gherasim, Dumitru; Rusu, Lucia. Forms and Techniques of Interviewing in Judicial Investigation in Criminal Proceedings: Theoretical and Practical Reflections, p. 204 [accessed: 15.04.2025]. Available at: https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/204-211_4.pdf

High Court of Justice, Criminal College. Decision of 02.07.2015 in Case No. 4-1re-121/2015. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=779 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

High Court of Justice, Criminal College. Decision of 05.10.2016 in Case No. 4-1re-163/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1365 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

High Court of Justice, Criminal College. Decision of 06.04.2017 in Case No. 4-1re-58/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1269 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Moldova, adopted on 14.03.2003. In: Official Gazette, No. 248–251, Article 699.

Court of Appeal Bălți. Civil and Administrative Litigation Division. Decision of 24.11.2023 in Case No. 1a-238/2023. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/1fb70b15-fc42-4d13-8c00-1b5c7963a218 [accessed: 18.06.2023].

Court of Appeal Bălți. Criminal Division. Decision of 11.03.2019 in Case No. 1a-585/2016. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/a39d4a58-ae5b-e911-80da-0050568b4d5b [accessed: 25.04.2024].

Court of Appeal Bălți. Decision of 14.03.2019 in Case No. 1a-585/2016. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/a39d4a58-ae5b-e911-80da0050568b4d5b [accessed: 19.12.2023].

Court of Appeal Chișinău. Criminal Division. Decision of 18.04.2016 in Case No. 1a-29/16. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/f3f20a18-4a2d-e611-9a6d-005056a5d154 [accessed: 18.04.2024].

Court of Appeal Chișinău. Criminal Division. Decision of 23.11.2023 in Case No. 1a-31/2022. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/432a13c9-30d9-4391-9e42-1fe2928fe254 [accessed: 23.01.2024].

Court of Appeal Comrat. Judicial College. Decision of 30.03.2020 in Case No. 1a86/2020. Available at: https://cacm.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/67948a99-17fb-4474-8819-f8977a754db3 [accessed: 15.04.2024].

Court of Appeal Comrat. Decision of 30.03.2020 in Case No. 1a-86/2020. Available at: https://cacm.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/67948a99-17fb-4474-8819-f8977a754db3 [accessed: 18.08.2024].

Belkin, A.R. Interrogation of the Expert as a Procedural Action. In: Theory and Practice of Judicial Expertise in Modern Conditions: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Moscow: Prospekt Publishing House, 2007, pp. 97–99.

Decision of the Bălți Court of Appeal of 14.03.2019, issued in Case No. 1a-585/2016. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/a39d4a58-ae5be911-80da-0050568b4d5b [accessed: 19.12.2023].

Decision of the Bălți Court of Appeal’s Civil and Administrative Litigation Panel of 24.11.2023, issued in Case No. 1a-238/2023. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/1fb70b15-fc42-4d13-8c00-1b5c7963a218 [accessed: 18.06.2023].

Decision of the Chișinău Court of Appeal, Criminal Panel, of 18.04.2016, issued in Case No. 1a-29/16. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/f3f20a18-4a2d-e611-9a6d-005056a5d154 [accessed: 18.04.2024].

Decision of the Chișinău Court of Appeal, Criminal Panel, of 18.04.2016, issued in Case No.1a-29/16. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/f3f20a18-4a2d-e611-9a6d-005056a5d154 [accessed: 18.04.2024].

Decision of the Chișinău Court of Appeal, Criminal Panel, of 23.11.2023, issued in Case No. 1a-31/2022. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/432a13c9-30d9-4391-9e42-1fe2928fe254 [accessed: 23.01.2024].

Decision of the Chișinău Court of Appeal, Criminal Panel, of 23.11.2023, issued in Case No. 1a-31/2022. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/432a13c9-30d9-4391-9e42-1fe2928fe254 [accessed: 23.01.2024].

Decision of the Comrat Court of Appeal Judicial Panel of 30.03.2020, issued in Case No.1a-86/2020. Available at: https://cacm.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/67948a99-17fb-4474-8819-f8977a754db3 [accessed: 15.04.2024].

Decision of the Comrat Court of Appeal of 30.03.2020, issued in Case No. 1a-86/2020. Available at: https://cacm.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/67948a99-17fb-4474-8819-f8977a754db3 [accessed: 18.08.2024].

Decision of the Comrat Court of Appeal, Judicial Panel, of 30.03.2020, issued in Case No.1a-86/2020. Available at: https://cacm.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/67948a99-17fb-4474-8819-f8977a754db3 [accessed: 18.08.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Bălți Court of Appeal of 11.03.2019, issued in Case No. 1a-585/2016. Available at: https://cab.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/a39d4a58-ae5b-e911-80da-0050568b4d5b [accessed: 25.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Chișinău Court of Appeal of 23.11.2023, issued in Case No. 1a-31/2022. Available at: https://cac.instante.justice.md/ro/pigd_integration/pdf/432a13c9-30d9-4391-9e42-1fe2928fe254 [accessed: 23.01.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 02.07.2015, issued in Case No. 4-1re-121/2015. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=779 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 05.10.2016, issued in Case No. 4-1re-163/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1365 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 06.04.2017, issued in Case No. 4-1re-58/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1269 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 07.05.2020, issued in Case No. 4-1re-2/2020. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=2034 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 13.12.2017, issued in Case No. 1ra-1575/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal.php?id=10057 [accessed: 24.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 17.11.2020, issued in Case No. 1ra-1413/2020. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal.php?id=17349&utm_source=chatgpt.com [accessed: 09.04.2024].

Decision of the Criminal Panel of the Supreme Court of Justice of 22.05.2019, issued in Case No. 1ra-794/2019. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal.php?id=13650&utm_source=chatgpt.com [accessed: 09.04.2024]

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 02.07.2015, issued in Case No. 4-1re-121/2015. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=779 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 05.10.2016, issued in Case No. 4-1re-163/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1365 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 06.04.2017, issued in Case No. 4-1re-58/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=1269 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 07.05.2020, issued in Case No. 4-1re-2/2020. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_plen_penal.php?id=2034 [accessed: 04.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 13.12.2017, issued in Case No. 1ra-1575/2017. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal.php?id=10057 [accessed: 24.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 17.11.2020, issued in Case No. 1ra-1413/2020. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal. php?id=17349&utm_source=chatgpt.com [accessed: 09.04.2024].

Decision of the Supreme Court of Justice, Criminal Panel, of 22.05.2019, issued in Case No. 1ra-794/2019. Available at: https://jurisprudenta.csj.md/search_col_penal.php?id=13650&utm_source=chatgpt.com [accessed: 09.04.2024].

Donskoy, D.D. The Function of Criminal Prosecution at the Pre-trial Stage. Abstract of the PhD thesis in Law. Rostov-on-Don, 2005, p. 8.

Drăgulean, Alexandru; Nestor, Sergiu. Psychological Coordinates of the Criminal Investigation Activity in the Process of Hearing the Suspect, Accused, Defendant. In: Scientific Annals of the “Ștefan cel Mare” Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova: Legal Sciences, 2015, No. XV(2), pp. 68-73.

Duvac, Constantin. Forensics. Bucharest: Hamangiu Publishing House, 2024.

Gavriș, Radu; Cazan, Elena; Matei, Daniela. The Tactics of Hearing in Criminal Proceedings: A Good Practice Guide. Târgu Jiu: Măiastra, 2020, pp. 17–47.

Gherasim, Dumitru; Rusu, Lucia. Forms and Techniques of Hearing During Judicial Investigation in Criminal Proceedings: Theoretical and Practical Reflections, p. 204 [accessed: 15.04.2025]. Available at: https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/204-211_4.pdf

Grinenko, A.V. Involving a Person as an Accused, Presenting the Accusation and Interrogating the Accused: Theoretical and Practical Problems. In: Criminal Proceedings: Theory and Practice. Moscow: Yurayt, 2011, pp. 480–490.

Kardashevskaya, M.V. On the Issue of the Periodization of Crime Investigations. In: Bulletin of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2013, Issue 1–2, p. 24.

Kibardin, I.P. On Some Aspects of the Defender’s Opposition During the Interrogation. In: Bulletin of Udmurt University, Issue No. 2-2/2014, pp. 226–228.

Konovalov, S.I.; Motorin, A.S. Interrogation in Criminal Proceedings: Problems of Correlation Between Procedural and Tactical Aspects. Monograph. Rostov-on-Don: DYI Publishing House, 2008.

Osipov, Yu.Yu. Tactical Features of the Interrogation of Participants in Organized Criminal Groups. In: Theory and Practice of Forensics and Judicial Expertise: Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Articles, Issue 11. Saratov, 2001, pp. 100–102.

Osoianu, Tudor; Ostavciuc, Dinu; Odagiu, Iurie; Rusnac, Constantin. Tactics of Criminal Investigation Actions. Chișinău: Military Book Publishing House, 2020. ISBN 9789975336604.

Ostavciuc, Dinu; Odagiu, Iurie. Tactics of Conducting Hearings: Methodical Guide for Criminal Investigation Officers. Legal Collection of the “Ștefan cel Mare” Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Chișinău, 2020, 72 p. ISBN 978-9975-3364-4-4.

Ostavciuc, Dinu; Odagiu, Iurie; Rusnac, Constantin. Investigation of Organized Crime Offenses: Practical Guide. Chișinău: S.n., 2016. ISBN 978-9975-121-35-4.

Ruiu, Marin. Forensics. Elements of Forensic Tactics. Bucharest: Universul Juridic Publishing House, 2017.

Shurukhnov, N.G. Investigative Actions of the Later Stage of Counterfeiting Investigation: Practical Significance and Tactical-Technological Foundations. In: Russian Investigator, 2014, No. 5, pp. 13–17.

Slavgorodskaya, O.A. Interrogation of Witnesses as a Source of Information in the Investigation of Money Laundering or Other Property Acquired by Other Persons Through Crime or by the Perpetrator as a Result of a Crime. In: Current Issues of Russian Law, 2008, No. 4 (9), pp. 362–368.

Stancu, Emilian. Treatise of Forensics. 4th revised edition. Bucharest, 2015.

Vasiliev, A.; Vinberg, A. et al. Forensics. Bucharest: Scientific Publishing House, 1961, p. 345.

Published

19.05.2026

Issue

Section

STUDIES AND COMMENTARY

How to Cite

Ostavciuc, D., Rusnac, C. and Păun, C.-B. (2026) “Tactical particularities of interrogation in the investigation of money laundering offenses”, Law and Life, (2(382), pp. 8–32. Available at: https://ojs.lux.md/legea-si-viata/article/view/18 (Accessed: 3 June 2026).

Similar Articles

1-10 of 16

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)