Polygraph testing: 10 years of practical application

Authors

  • Igor Doncenco Centrul Tehnico-criminalistic și Expertize Judiciare al IGP al MAI Author

Keywords:

polygraph, polygraph testing, simulated behavior detector, criminal investigation, personnel selection, judicial decisions, Forensicand Judicial Expertise Center

Abstract

The article analyzes the evolution and effectiveness of polygraph testing in the Republic of Moldova over a decade of institutional application (2014–2023) within the Forensic and Judicial Expertise Center of the General Police Inspectorate. Relevant quantitative data are presented concerning the frequency of polygraph tests and the types of requests received, highlighting a high degree of accuracy and significant practical applicability. In order to assess the actual impact of the method, the test results were compared with court rulings, and the use of polygraph was examined from multiple perspectives. The article also addresses the current status and implementation of polygraph testing in the Republic of Moldova, United States of America, Romania, and Ukraine. Based on the gathered experience, it can be concluded that polygraph testing effectively contributes to the clarification of complex cases and, in certain situations, enables the retrieval of additional relevant information. The conclusions emphasize the relevance of the polygraph as a complementary investigative tool, while also underscoring the need for continuous development of the field through advanced professional training, regulatory harmonization, and the expansion of its application under scientifically rigorous and ethically responsible conditions.

References

1. Legea nr. 269 din 12.12.2008 privind aplicarea testării la detectorul comportamentului simulat (poligraf). https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=141821&lang=ro (accesat la data de 10.04.2025).

2. Legea nr. 45 din 12.04.1994 privind activitatea operativă de investigații. https://www.legis.md/cautare/getResults?doc_id=96225&lang=ro (accesat la data de 10.04.2025).

3. Comisia de Stat pentru testări cu utilizarea poligrafului: legislație. https://www.cna.md/tabview.php?l=ro&idc=110&t=/Comisia-de-stat-pentru-testari-cu-utilizarea-poligrafului/Legislatie& (accesat la data de 10.04.2025).

4. Hotărârea Curții Constituționale privind excepția de neconstituționalitate a unor prevederi din Legea nr.269 din 12 decembrie 2008 privind aplicarea testării la detectorul comportamentului simulat (poligraf) și din Legea nr.132 din 17 iunie 2016 cu privire la Autoritatea Națională de Integritate din 10 aprilie 2018. https://constcourt.md/ccdocview.php?tip=hotariri&docid=652&l=ro (accesat la data de 10.04.2025).

5. Raportul de activitate a Comisiei de Stat pentru testări cu utilizarea poligrafului, 2023. https://www.cna.md/public/files/Raport_de_activitate_al_CSTUP_pentru_anuBiroul Național de Statistică: Infracțiuni înregistrate (Tipul infracțiunii și Ani). https://statbank.statistica.md:443/PxWeb/sq/de760d93-f93b-4ede-bd73-92bb1e3db57f (accesat la data de 17.04.2025).

7. Centrul de Analiză şi Prevenirea Corupției – testarea benevolă cu aparatul poligraf a reprezentanților sectorului justiției, 2013. https://www.capc.md/docs/studiu_polygraph.doc (accesat la data de 17.04.2025).

8. Portalul Național al Instanțelor de Judecată (Ministerul Justiției al RM). https://instante.justice.md/ro/hotaririle-instantei (accesat la data de 10.04.2025).

9. American Polygraph Association: Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.polygraph.org/docs/APA_FAQ_Sheet-12JUL23.pdf (accesat la data de 17.04.2025).

10. Registrul Unic al Psihologilor cu drept de liberă practică gestionat de Colegiul Psihologilor din România. https://www.copsi.ro/index.php/registre (accesat la data de 29.05.2025).

11. Ghidul Ministerului Justiției privind expertizele tehnice judiciare, specializarea 74 – Psihologie https://www.just.ro/GhidExp/GhidulSpecializarilor/74.pdf (accesat la data de 29.05.2025).

12. Butenko O. V. (2022). Legal status of the initiator and the person granting permission to conduct a polygraph test.Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 12(2), 16-23. https://elar.navs.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/8a1a7b44-5ce9-49f3-b9f3-8ea97c7a8685/content (accesat la data de 29.05.2025).

13. Registrul Național al Poligrafologilor din Ucraina. https://polygraph.ua/register-ofpolygraph-examiners/ (accesat la data de 29.05.2025).

14. Europolygraph: Frequently Asked Questions about the Use of the Polygraph as a Credibility Diagnostic Tool, 2024. https://europolygraph.org/en/frequently-askedquestions-about-the-use-of-the-polygraphas-a-credibility-diagn

Published

22.05.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Doncenco, I. (2026) “Polygraph testing: 10 years of practical application”, Scientific Annals of the "Ştefan cel Mare" Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova, (21), pp. 121–133. Available at: https://ojs.lux.md/anale-stiintifice/article/view/72 (Accessed: 3 June 2026).

Similar Articles

1-10 of 18

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.